==== New Approaches And Needs In Foresight ==== (workshop at FTA 2014 - 27 NOV 2014) short summary workshop "New approaches in FTA / foresight" at the EU FTA conference, November 2014 (based on notes from Cornelia Daheim) ===New Approaches=== {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/15902727641/}} FoAM on [[http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/15902727641/|flickr]] 4 major clusters: - IT-based / "automated” foresight (in early stages, to be used with a "disclaimer” because of the current hype, experiences still have to be evaluated and sense-making still not generated;) Relies strongly on having had a precise "question" / task before starting - Integrated qualitative-quantitative approaches. Few examples, debated how far foresight should go - should never succumb to the traditional numbers dominance - Open and Crowdsourced * Lots of potential also in terms of who funds foresight and how - crowdfunding possibilities e.g. for regional / community foresight * Quite widespread in terms of open approaches - New forms of communication: Storytelling / Visualization / Gaming: * Here, we had the most real "new" examples, e.g. from overlaps / working with Design Fiction, Experiential Foresight (Roleplaying), "Tangible Foresight" ("Exhibitions" / Futures Windows; Objects from the future, ...) * Major potential for improving the impact / establishing new routes to engagement * Further Trends / Tendencies: Impacts Assessment; Focus on Pre-Foresight-Phase (Conceptualization); Tailor-Made Foresight / Test-driving and then adapting approaches / Stochastic tinkering for finding best approach; Cluster / cross-sectoral foresight; Open Innovation Foresight ; Meta-Trend = towards hybrid / combined approaches * new application fields also emerging, e.g. society-wide foresight, e.g. with kids; or foresight for therapy, … New or Unmet Needs in Foresight Where are new needs? * Needs in Innovation Field are expanding * Also in corporate foresight * Health / social systems * “Political” Foresight Need for Shared Theoretical Background / Futures Literacy / practical principles * Shared language / vocabulary * Prove / exemplify impacts * Practitioners being clear about values * Need for more value-based approaches ===Tools and Skills Needs=== {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/15904696785/}} FoAM on [[http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/15904696785/|flickr]] * Open Toolkits / Prototypes * Take into account emotions and experience * Use of narratives / storytelling; stimulating the imagination * Integrate diversity of input (“overflow” effect) * Selling power needed * Bridge need for reflecting complexity and smart / emotional communication means * Speed - can we provide instant gratification in foresight? * Need for skills in change management / changing of cultures (in organizations) Lots of room for improvement in realm of implementing results / link to decision-making * Improve impacts by analysing power / timing issues (right person / right time) * Clarify objectives; Increase acceptance of outputs; give meaning to results * Create link to implementation / strategy (top-down or bottom-up?); internalization needed * Create demand for citizens ===Foresight 2030 === {{>http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/15717210038/}} FoAM on [[http://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/15717210038/|flickr]] * Many alternative scenarios possible * Threat of "automation" / takeover from other disciplines / actors * Opportunity for larger-scale roll-out if being clear on what it can and can't do, relies on clearly demonstrated benefits * Foresight as an everyday tool: low cost and easily accessible tools for the everyday user - personal fore-sighting * Professional foresight becomes more about framing, sense making and narrative - as scanning becomes more automated Who pays for foresight in 2030? Alongside a traditional commissioning model by corporations and governments, crowd funded foresight occurs when groups of individuals involved in communities/advocacy come together to co-fund the foresight projects they really want to see * Foresight becomes part of developing resilience, adapting to change and facilitating behavioral shifts and changing culture Overall insight, across all 3 groups / topics: New approaches are developing rapidly, especially from working with / overlaps with approaches from other disciplines. The (partly normative) discussion in the community is still missing on which new approaches to push where and for what specific purpose, or where / how to also "counteract" trends and safeguard foresight depth and quality levels.