Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
marine_colab:system_change_experiment [2015-03-16 10:14] – nik | marine_colab:system_change_experiment [2015-03-16 16:09] – nik | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==== System Change Experiment ==== | ==== System Change Experiment ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | (an experiment from the [[workshop_201503|March workshop]]) | ||
===Hypothesis=== | ===Hypothesis=== | ||
- | {{> | + | {{> |
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
===Experiment design=== | ===Experiment design=== | ||
{{> | {{> | ||
[[https:// | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | An investigation | ||
+ | |||
+ | What traction could we gain as a group if we focus on a single problem? Can we find a common issue to bring our respective resources to? How do we identify a tipping point? | ||
+ | |||
+ | It’s important to understand what existing approaches have worked, what success factors, tools and motivations are around to create system change. | ||
+ | |||
+ | If system innovation is a set of interventions that come together: | ||
+ | * is it then possible to co-ordinate a set of disparate interventions (with different theories of change) to deliberately shift a system into a more sustainable state? when are these co-ordinated actions an improvement over individual uncoordinated activities? | ||
+ | * do levers come together in a way that can add value? | ||
+ | * what impact could we hope for? How do we measure this? | ||
+ | |||
+ | (Expected) Outcome: | ||
+ | * identified issues and tipping points | ||
+ | * road map of tools, effects and approaches to use and [timings?] united (reflection on what has/ | ||
+ | * possible future experiment for a strategic set of interventions or projects designed/ | ||
+ | * framework/ | ||
+ | * visual theory of change | ||
+ | * low tech and low cost documentation | ||
+ | |||
+ | Implementation: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Ideally everyone can be included at different points | ||
+ | * Allow common evaluation with some kind of format/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. Horizon scan for tipping points, future opportunities, | ||
+ | * WG review of information (like-minded or interested people to reflect/ | ||
+ | * help uncovering emerging issues | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. Explore overlap of interests and scenarios for action (Venn diagrams of interests) | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. Go/no go check (feasibility) | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4. Architect to design and [innovate?] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Resources: | ||
+ | * staff time (commission others outside of the group for research) | ||
+ | * separate meeting | ||
+ | * buy-in/ | ||
+ | * willingness to open up strategies | ||
+ | * review of potential options to test logic, feasibility, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Needs == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Contributions of knowledge and learning to identify components of behaviour change; case studies, reflection, stories, suggestions, | ||
+ | * Come to group discussion | ||
+ | * Buy-in to horizon scanning and where [xxx] to intervene | ||
+ | * Suggestion of others outside of the group | ||
+ | * Testing the logic | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Offers == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * MVL: Time, examples, analysis, [Lessons learned?], horizon scanning | ||
+ | * Nic: My time, reflection on past experiences, | ||
+ | * Andrew Farmer: Horizon scanning, meetings | ||
+ | * Amy: Time, ideas, experiences, | ||
+ | * Sue: review of success and what has worked | ||
+ | * NEF: share our experience, lessons in campaigning, | ||
+ | * SL: Review of lessons learned, horizon scanning [+planning? | ||
+ | * Louisa [intelligence? | ||
+ | * Giles: System [xxx] architecture, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Progress=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Results=== | ||
+ |